Building on the literature review, a web-based survey was conducted in 2011 to identify exposure assessment capabilities and best practices for chemical incident response in Member States. Experts from 26 Member States completed the survey. Some examples of our findings are listed below. Organisation of (international) collaboration All countries have been identified as having institutions supervising environmental monitoring and public health exposure characterisation in case of a major chemical incident. International cooperation agreements exist at national level. Best practices: - Clearly specified scope of each institution’s responsibilities in exposure assessment
- Official protocols and procedures on responsibilities and cooperation
- Effective information exchange
- Regular (international) trainings, conferences, meetings – raising awareness of neighbouring country emergency response capabilities and networking
Field monitoring Environmental monitoring is usually carried out during and after an incident within the emergency exclusionary zone and off site for assessing public exposure. Best practices: - Repeated monitoring, also shelter areas and other areas relevant to human exposure, especially sensitive populations
- Specialist, chemically trained first responders in fire and ambulance services
- Standardisation of reference values for risk assessment
- Mobile field laboratories for both domestic and cross-border use
Laboratory network and modelling Almost all countries have a national laboratory network. Dispersion models andGISare used by different organisations. Best practices: - An interdisciplinary procedure for sampling, detection, identification and monitoring
- Compatible dispersion models and GIS are used by risk assessors on both sides of the border
|