The European Commission (EC) intends to establish a digital infrastructure for advanced materials called the ‘Materials Commons’. This initiative intends to enhance the design, development, and testing of advanced materials. A key aspect of the platform will involve the use of artificial intelligence tools, which can potentially be used for optimized hazard and risk assessment of advanced materials.

A recent critical perspective argues that nanomaterials should be regulated as biological rather than chemical entities. The researchers emphasise the importance of using existing knowledge about the biological interactions of nanomaterials and their impact on human health and the environment. The authors list various well-known challenges regarding the safety assessment of nanomaterials.

The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has introduced new guidance for evaluating nanoparticles in food that may dissolve in lipids before consumption. By using the 1-octanol-water partition coefficient (KOW) method nanospecific considerations for safety assessments may potentially be waived.

Titanium dioxide (TiO2), previously banned as a food additive (E 171) in 2022 due to safety concerns, is used in medicines as an excipient. French scientists have estimated the intake of TiO2 from oral medications, finding that 54% contained TiO2, with an average daily intake of 1.71 mg. This is lower compared to the exposure from food when E 171 was still allowed.

Ex vivo exposure of human placentas to realistic concentrations of titanium dioxide (TiO2) and silicium dioxide (SiO2) nanoparticles affect placental protein secretion, which slowed the growth of new blood vessels in an in vitro model. Current regulatory guidelines do not sufficiently address placental toxicity, highlighting the need for improved testing methods to evaluate the reproductive and developmental toxicity of nanomaterials.

Early4AdMa is an early awareness and action system for identifying emerging issues of advanced materials. Its first application on nanocarriers has revealed several potential issues for nanocarrier materials. These include the applicability of current regulations regarding nanocarriers. In various chemical domains this needs to be critically assessed in more detail. Further, research activities should focus on the carrier’s influence on the active ingredient. What happens to the carrier itself after its work is done also requires attention. Overall, the workshop results demonstrate that the Early4AdMa system may help to identify potential issues with safety, sustainability, and regulation. Provided that these issues are addressed through follow-up actions, this may help regulatory preparedness and contribute to safer materials.

Electronic waste (e-waste) is a valuable source of precious and rare metals. Recycling of e-waste is an essential step towards sustainability. Scientists are currently studying methods to convert the metals present in e-waste into nanoparticles. However, it is important to consider the possible risks associated with this process to maximise its positive environmental impact.

Danish researchers assessed recommendations for adjustments to legislation for nanomaterials published in 2004. While many of these recommendations were partly or fully met, some legislation still needs adjustments for nanomaterials. For example, the definition of nanomaterials differs between legislations. Additionally, instruments to measure nanomaterials and test methods require further development to meet regulatory requirements and enable enforcement. Advanced materials may pose additional challenges in risk assessment. The legislation amendments for nanomaterials may not necessarily identify potential hazards and risks for advanced materials.

Respirable rigid fibres are considered more hazardous than non-rigid fibres. However, there is currently no standardised method to measure fibre rigidity. A new approach uses techniques to identify changes at the molecular level in cells. This approach can distinguish between different types of carbonaceous materials. The researchers could tell the difference between rigid fibres, non-rigid fibres, and non-fibrous carbonaceous materials. For this they looked at which biological pathways were affected. This method will help group different types of fibres into hazard categories based on their rigidity.

Bioaccumulation assessment of nanomaterials cannot be done using the equilibrium partitioning method commonly used for organic chemicals. Therefore, the current guidance on bioaccumulation assessment is not suitable for nanomaterials. To address this issue, the OECD has proposed a tiered approach designed specifically for nanomaterials. This approach is tailored for metallic and metal oxide particles but can likely be extended to other advanced (nano)materials as well.